two days ago, in the post "changes everything changes" , I had a mini debate with Kirchner. In his last message , you can read sentences like:
"Others, knowing they were not the best policy, it was decided to integrate the FPV simply because they add up (whether votes, power, etc.). That is the political power to govern together "
(leave a link) ... there you can see the strongly criticizing Craig Barrett. It is thought that four years after it was appropriate that he was listed as Deputy. I do not think many things to share and today it is clear the error, but I suppose that once Camacho will have been committed to support the model which was being elected. "
Just today I found a video of another guy who also pledged to support the model. But I admit a mistake, because in that post I wrote about the alleged money from politicians, that before 2007 were noble and had convictions but three years later he turned them. In this case, but only spent three years four months.
Y here is where I question arises: either begin to distrust those who claim to defend the model and begin to analyze whether the famous model to hold, does not need these people. Because, citing Comrade K, these people "knowing that they were not the best policy, it was decided to integrate the FPV simply because they add up (whether votes, power, etc.), because that is the political power to govern together ".
0 comments:
Post a Comment