Before I make clear from which place I speak, if there are any unwary reader. In the Marianist work friends, a family, I had a good memory of the twelve years I spent there and also linked to a project. Made the clarification beginning.
The note written by Sebastian Clemente is a "great" picture of the situation they are living ... only one party. In no time the article there is an attempt to explain the rationale for the neighbors to make that decision. It is clear that no one likes to take some land and risk the police (the same that he has no problem with get you a couple of shots) repressed. This is done when there is no choice, if not you have another when you're desperate.
Passages like: "The Marianist College sports center was the most affected because the shacks were installed in one of its sides, which gives Riestra, and in the forehead above Lafuente, so that the gateway was virtually surrounded ", do nothing but reinforce that journalism class that prevails today in the media. What do you call journalism class? The focus with which the news shows. The criterion for deciding when a story is news. The vocabulary used. It is innocent say that the door of the school was surrounded. Even if the journalist has no conscious evil intent, it remains, although it is so naturalized that neither it must be reported in the best.
The danger, the worry, the problem is not that local residents do not have to live. Here the danger is that the door is surrounded Marianist College. The danger, then, is the invisible becoming visible. The problem is that you have not but a few blocks before your eyes. When that happens, and you can not look to the side. When that happens, the speech must inevitably be accompanied by action. And that is where the contradiction is heightened. And that's where everyone will have to choose which side to stand ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment